What to expect from World Cup 2026

It is now two months until the World Cup 2026 kicks off on June 11th, with Mexico debuting the tournament vs South Africa in the country’s capital, Mexico City.

It is seemingly difficult to read between the lines of football fans as to whether they are disconcerted or excited for the upcoming tournament. Although we should expect global superstars to light it up on the biggest stage of all and see the unravelling of many high-quality nations battling for the most ostentatious prize in football – who will be triumphant? I think first it’s important to dissect the most talked-about topics leading up to this summer’s campaign.

The most notable change in this year’s World Cup compared to previous tournaments is the structure, with 48 countries competing. Usually, you would see around 32 sides playing across a 30-day tournament. So, the question is: are this many nations superfluous, inclusive, or more entertaining? This year there will be 104 matches, with 12 group stages, and qualifying teams making it to a knockout stage of 32 sides – an additional round from the traditional starting point of the last 16, with the competition lasting 39 days. I feel not many would argue that with this many fixtures and countries taking part, fan engagement should be sky high and provide more entertainment.

Additionally, there is also fan concern regarding a possible dilution of team quality due to the scheduling. With the World Cup being played across three different countries – Mexico, Canada and the US – and the finalists and semi-finalists playing up to eight matches, there is a fear there may be a lot of fatigue and injuries induced by this new intensity of tournament formatting, along with the consideration of extreme heat across locations.

With there being 48 sides, many people feel it is now a more inclusive environment for nations that rarely qualify, particularly those in North America, Africa and Asia. It now provides them with a global platform to represent their proud countries in football’s biggest prize and showcase their passion for the sport, the badge on their shirts, and what sport is truly about. However, there is also the view that lower-quality sides could create a less competitive early stage of the competition, which some fans may feel less compelled to watch. Others argue the extra 16 sides are simply superfluous and that the new format is somewhat precarious.

Personally, although I suspect FIFA’s incentive for a 48-country tournament is largely financial, and I don’t agree with many of their motivations within football, I am happy to see more passionate and proud nations compete. I think it will create a better atmosphere for the tournament, but I do understand the opposing points of view.

Fans have also felt unsettled by the US being the primary host of the World Cup. From a European perspective, this is partly due to the time difference; for example, in the UK many matches will air at 2–3am, meaning a lot will be missed by European audiences. It also becomes a point of frustration when considering the cost of travelling to the US to watch matches. It has been expressed by fans around the world that ticket prices make it almost impossible for the average supporter to attend, with reports of opening match tickets being listed at $11,000. This raises the question: will die-hard football fans be at the final, or will it primarily be wealthy spectators witnessing a spectacle?

Say a lower-income nation (LIC) makes it to the final – how many of their fans can realistically attend in New Jersey? It’s just not feasible. It’s a sad reality that the corporate greed of FIFA may once again prioritise profit over making the tournament accessible to fans.

I also sense it is a disconcerting time to host a World Cup in the USA considering the political climate and its relations with other nations globally. With current tensions, some of the competing countries face visa restrictions, meaning travel could be difficult without prior approval. Additionally, ongoing reports of ICE activities have left some fans and journalists concerned about their safety and wellbeing when entering the country.

There is also the concern that Donald Trump may attract significant media attention during the World Cup and attempt to leverage it to boost his global profile, potentially repeating controversial appearances at major footballing events – such as the Club World Cup final last summer in New Jersey, when Chelsea defeated PSG. That moment received backlash from fans on social media, and there is concern it could happen again.

Hopefully, however, the tournament can boost fan interest in North America. The last World Cup hosted in the US took place in 1994, where journalists were initially pessimistic, and fans worldwide were confused as to why a nation with limited interest in the sport had been chosen. However, the tournament was a commercial success and changed football in America significantly. The sport became more recognised and respected soon after. For example, 11 million Americans tuned in to watch the round of 16 match vs Brazil on July 4th (Independence Day). The tournament also broke records, with an average attendance of 67,000 spectators per match. Although football has made huge strides in the US since then, this World Cup will likely elevate interest even further.

What can we expect from the favourites, and who will be the dark horses of this tournament? It is fair to say we are all excited to see the biggest superstars in the world showcase their talent.

The favourites coming into the tournament are Spain. They are coming off the back of winning the Euros and have a young, incredibly gifted squad – most notably Lamine Yamal and Pedri, who are among the best in their positions. Players like Cucurella and Rodri bring experience, stability and class to the defensive and midfield lines. You can expect them to play high-pressing, possession-heavy football.

Next are France. Players such as Kylian Mbappé, Dembélé and Olise, all at the peak of their powers, will make it exceptionally difficult for opposition defences to cope with their attacking threat. With a young squad full of depth, alongside experienced players like Kanté, Rabiot, Upamecano and Hernandez – many of whom were part of the 2018 World Cup-winning team – France remain a formidable force.

We must also address England. With an exceptional group of talented players and consistent deep runs in recent tournaments – including a World Cup semi-final and multiple Euros finals appearances – they have come very close. With new talent emerging and the addition of Champions League-winning manager Thomas Tuchel, can England finally get over the line? Players such as Rice, Kane and others at their peak suggest there is enough quality and experience. However, there are natural reservations: has Tuchel had enough time to implement his style, and concerns around the form of players like Bellingham, Palmer, Foden and Saka – as well as potential injuries – may affect confidence.

Other worthy mentions include Germany and Portugal, both boasting high-quality squads. As for a dark horse, I’m going to back Japan.

In conclusion, we can expect a high-quality and competitive World Cup with plenty of surprises and gripping moments. While concerns around the expanded format and travel demands are valid, as fans all we can do is embrace the spectacle. With more nations and matches than ever, it’s something to enjoy – especially as it only comes around every four years.

I would like to conclude by predicting that Spain will win their second World Cup.